The global skin packaging market was valued at USD 11.94 billion in 2024 to achieve USD 19.30 billion by 2034, increasing at a 4.95% CAGR between 2024 and 2034.
Amcor, a leader in the world of packaging solutions, bases its skin packaging strategy on sustainability and innovation. The organisation allocates resources towards research & development in order to produce pioneering skin packaging solutions that satisfy changing consumer demands while reducing environmental effect.
For Instance,
Bemis Company Inc. bases its skin packaging strategy on a customer-centric methodology. The companys mission is to satisfy each customers individual demands with creative, superior packaging solutions. Bemis aims to establish enduring relationships with clients by providing all-inclusive packaging solutions, encompassing design, production, and transportation services.
For Instance,
Berry Global Inc. skin packaging strategy places a strong emphasis on expanding its market reach and offering a diverse range of products. The company offers a wide range of skin packaging solutions across numerous industries and countries by leveraging its global presence and significant manufacturing capabilities.
For Instance,
The skin packaging strategy of Sealed Air Corporation is based on innovation. The organisation allocates resources towards research and development in order to generate state-of-the-art skin packaging solutions that offer consumers enhanced performance and value.
For Instance,

| Metric | Q4 23 | Q1 24 | Q2 24 | Q3 24 | Q4 24 | Q1 25 | Q2 25 | Q3 25 | Current |
| Total common shares outstanding | 120.64 M | 120.76 M | 120.64 M | 119.63 M | 118.50 M | 116.39 M | 116.38 M | 115.35 M | 115.35 M |
| Price to earnings ratio | 24.48 | 22.86 | 20.62 | 118.08 | 23.21 | 19.18 | 21.61 | 11.95 | 12.11 |
| Price to sales ratio | 0.92 | 0.8 | 0.76 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| Price to cash flow ratio | 7.25 | 5.74 | 5.67 | 7.21 | 6.41 | 6.34 | 7.23 | 6.67 | 6.75 |
| Price to book ratio | 4.61 | 3.87 | 3.58 | 4.53 | 3.56 | 3.86 | 4.15 | 3.69 | 3.74 |
| Enterprise value | 17.78 B | 16.41 B | 15.50 B | 17.84 B | 15.68 B | 16.69 B | 18.07 B | 16.98 B | 17.24 B |
| Enterprise value to EBITDA ratio | 9.17 | 8.51 | 7.98 | 9.07 | 7.92 | 8.11 | 8.66 | 8.02 | 8.18 |
| Return on assets % | 3.07 | 2.85 | 2.94 | 0.67 | 2.94 | 3.86 | 3.8 | 6.38 | 6.38 |
| Return on equity % | 21.13 | 18.44 | 18.22 | 4.02 | 16.42 | 21.3 | 20.64 | 34.1 | 34.1 |
| Return on invested capital % | 4.97 | 4.48 | 4.79 | 1.08 | 4.64 | 6.52 | 6.44 | 10.32 | 10.32 |
| Gross margin % | 17.42 | 15.57 | 18.07 | 18.92 | 18.46 | 17.79 | 18.96 | 19.26 | 19.26 |
| Operating margin % | 12.35 | 10.04 | 13.16 | 14.18 | 13.38 | 12.53 | 13.84 | 14.42 | 14.42 |
| EBITDA margin % | 16.79 | 14.17 | 16.93 | 17.88 | 16.97 | 16.33 | 17.47 | 18.04 | 18.04 |
| Net margin % | 1.12 | 2.4 | 5.7 | −5.68 | 12.37 | 6.68 | 5.76 | 6.68 | 6.68 |
| Quick ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.8 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 1.19 | 1.05 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.16 |
| Inventory turnover | 5.52 | 5.36 | 5.68 | 6.02 | 6.36 | 6.21 | 6.2 | 6.14 | 6.14 |
| Asset turnover | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| Debt to assets ratio | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Debt to equity ratio | 3.2 | 3.11 | 3.04 | 3.05 | 2.33 | 2.47 | 2.32 | 2.19 | 2.19 |
| Long term debt to total assets ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.4 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Long term debt to total equity ratio | 2.85 | 2.75 | 2.44 | 2.7 | 2.26 | 1.82 | 2 | 1.97 | 1.97 |
| Revenue per share | 23.88 | 23.27 | 25.49 | 25.83 | 24.39 | 24.7 | 27.14 | 27.69 | 104.84 |
| Operating cash flow per share | 5.75 | −0.85 | 3.71 | 4.64 | 5.34 | 0.12 | 3.88 | 5.01 | 14.49 |
| Free cash flow per share | 4.26 | −1.64 | 3.01 | 4.01 | 4.08 | −0.16 | 3.39 | 4.22 | 11.63 |
| EBIT per share | 2.95 | 2.34 | 3.36 | 3.66 | 3.26 | 3.09 | 3.76 | 3.99 | 14.23 |
| EBITDA per share | 4.01 | 3.3 | 4.32 | 4.62 | 4.14 | 4.03 | 4.74 | 5 | 18.06 |
| Book value per share | 19.98 | 20.45 | 20.78 | 21.16 | 23.26 | 23.15 | 24.84 | 26.15 | 26.15 |
| Total debt per share | 64.3 | 64.07 | 63.68 | 64.76 | 54.15 | 56.79 | 57.88 | 57.05 | 57.05 |
| Cash per share | 11.69 | 10.17 | 12.61 | 15.36 | 8.57 | 7.51 | 8.96 | 11.05 | 11.05 |
| Net current asset value per share | −62.62 | −59.09 | −60.25 | −62.98 | −47.97 | −50.42 | −51.18 | −49.69 | −49.69 |
| Tangible book value per share | −16.29 | −15.07 | −13.79 | −13.68 | −10.48 | −11.40 | −10.98 | −9.68 | −9.68 |
| Working capital per share | 5.24 | 5.94 | 2.02 | 7.31 | 6.3 | −5.31 | 2.4 | 5.57 | 5.57 |
| CapEx per share | 1.49 | 0.78 | 0.7 | 0.64 | 1.26 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.8 | 2.85 |
Nancy Mahon, chief sustainability officer of the Estée Lauder Companies states that the company has a chance to advance its package innovation by sticking to sustainability standards that enable it to provide "elegant solutions" for its customers while being environmentally conscious. ELC claims that its in-house R&D labs and packaging development teams are committed in producing goods that prioritize inclusivity and sustainability. The company stated that its 2020 packaging sustainability guidelines offer a "roadmap," highlighting tactics including cutting back on the use of packaging materials, creating for reuse, and boosting recycled content. These recommendations support the integration of sustainability concepts at the center of its packaging choices, in conjunction with specially created tools and industry practices such third-party reviewed life-cycle evaluations. By weight, 71% of the packaging produced by the Estée Lauder Companies (ELC) is available in recyclable, refillable, reusable, recyclable, or recoverable.
By means of industry-leading partnerships and creative solutions, ELC hopes to establish new benchmarks for sustainability in the beauty sector. For instance, the Aveda brand created regionally recyclable, paper-based packets for product samples. This sachets manufacturing uses at least 36% less water and produces 37% fewer greenhouse gases than its plastic counterparts, demonstrating ELCs commitment to using innovation to satisfy customer demands. Offering refillable choices or switching from plastic to glass packaging, ELCs array of brands demonstrates how luxury and sustainability go hand in hand. For instance, the relaunch of Estée Lauders well-known Revitalizing Supreme+ Moisturizer Youth Power Creme, which includes a refillable pod to assist reduce package weight, was facilitated by the companys usage of glass packaging to further its luxury and sustainability design strategy.