Description- Pharmaceutical packaging manufacturers are working on packaging designs as per new EU PPWR requirements to highlight simpler material structures.
In August 2026, the pharmaceutical packaging industry is recently experiencing major changes in its designs due to reforms made under the EU’s PPWR new requirements. The changes are also making companies reassess materials, structures, and formats in response to the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), which began applying this month.
Instead of waiting for the regulation’s longer-term requirements, especially for those taking effect from 2030, the packaging manufacturers are already working with customers to simplify structures, lower material use, and also improve recyclability along with maintaining performance.
Paige Greenberg, sustainable packaging engineer at the US-based pharmaceutical packaging supplier Plastic Ingenuity, explains that several of the PPWR’s technical requirements are still being finalized through future delegated and implementing acts.
“Detailed design-for-recycling criteria and the methodology for assessing whether packaging is recycled at scale will shape many future compliance obligations, making it important for packaging manufacturers to stay engaged as the regulatory framework evolves,” says Greenberg. “In the meantime, manufacturers can help customers evaluate their packaging portfolios, identify higher-risk formats, and begin redesign efforts early so they are better positioned for future compliance.”
ACG Group, an India-based global supplier of pharmaceutical packaging, is seeing a major shift in how its partners in the space are designing their packaging, according to Jochen Scheil, VP of Global Sales and Business Development, and Dr. Sheikh Akbar Ali, head of Development and Technology, at ACG Packaging Materials.
“Companies are no longer waiting for the 2030 PPWR deadlines. Instead, they are actively overhauling their packaging portfolios now to ensure market access,” Scheil and Akbar Ali tell us.
Scheil and Akbar Ali emphasize the fact that the most common practical design changes ACG’s customers implement include shifting to high-barrier monomaterial blisters, such as its RecycloPod, and packaging minimization through downsizing blister pockets, like its SuperPod.
“The most significant trend we are seeing is the transition away from traditional, unrecyclable, multimaterial structures such as PVC, PE, and PVdC [polyvinylidene chloride] laminates,” they say. “Additionally, PPWR strictly targets ‘over-packaging’ and mandates the elimination of unnecessary space in primary and secondary packaging configurations.”
The ACG customers are also transitioning to PFAS-free and metal-free formulations and overhauling secondary cartons with fully post-consumer recycled fibers, as per the speakers.
“With PPWR heavily restricting hazardous substances and heavy metals in packaging components, customers are screening every layer of their packaging materials and artwork.”
Greenberg states that the PPWR’s specific PFAS concentration limits may apply to food-contact packaging, but healthcare companies may request broader chemical documentation as part of their internal compliance and risk management programs.
Scheil and Akbar Ali highlight that secondary packaging does not benefit from safety exemptions, resulting in it undergoing the “fastest and most aggressive” design changes.
“These proactive changes are proving to be a significant competitive advantage. Brands that update their packaging lines today will avoid the major bottlenecks expected when testing laboratories and regulatory agencies become overwhelmed.”
Greenberg also states that Plastic Ingenuity is already seeing an increased interest in switching to base materials that better align with established recycling streams and simplifying packaging structures. The companies are also ensuring to incorporate recycled content, if performance and regulatory requirements allow.
“Secondary packaging can often provide a practical starting point because there may be greater flexibility in introducing these changes,” she adds.
Discussing how thermoformed pharmaceutical packaging may evolve ahead of the PPWR’s 2030 recyclability deadlines, Greenberg predicts an optimization of material gauges, dimensions, or components, as well as a shift away from material combinations that interfere with sorting and recycling.
“Packaging must meet ‘design for recycling.’ The phased performance grades apply from January 1, 2030 (design assessment against recyclability grades). Plastic packaging carries binding minimum recycled-content shares from this date, with higher thresholds from 2040,” according to Articles 6 and 7 of the PPWR.
Customers are also preparing for expanded documentation requirements, Greenberg reminds. “The legislation calls for material composition and compliance documentation, including information related to PFAS and other substances of concern.”
“PPWR’s specific PFAS concentration limits apply to food-contact packaging, but healthcare companies may still request broader chemical documentation as part of their internal compliance and risk management programs.”
Scheil and Akbar Ali point out that the PPWR introduces a demanding schedule of milestones extending through to 2035, calling on companies to “begin preparing today.”
“Pharmaceutical packaging requires extensive stability data and good manufacturing practice validation lines. Healthcare companies cannot treat future dates as distant problems. Brands that update their packaging lines today will avoid the major bottlenecks expected when testing laboratories and regulatory agencies become overwhelmed closer to the deadline.”
“PPWR represents a major shift in how packaging is designed, documented, and evaluated across the European market,” she concludes. “While its goals apply broadly across industries, pharmaceutical and medical packaging must meet these new circularity expectations and continue to protect product quality, sterility, shelf life, and patient safety.”
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
31 August 2026